International Courts
MEET THE EXECUTIVE BOARD

President of the International Courts : Aditya Ankhad
Deputy Presidents of the International Courts : Jiana Shroff and Prisha Israni

"The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom."
- John Locke

Dear Delegates and MUN Directors,

For centuries, man has looked to the law to uphold justice. From Hammurabi’s code, to the complex, multifaceted and all important treaties in today’s world, law has shaped the way we perceive the world. In the quest for equity in an increasingly polarized and hateful world, judicial systems stand as a beacon of hope.

In shining light of the present age, the epitome of impartiality, hearing the most significant matters, we find the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court. But equally important stand the precursors to these unequivocally important bodies. The Nuremberg Tribunal set up in the aftermath of World War 2, to hold leaders who committed the most heinous of crimes accountable. Crucially, it was the first instance of individuals tried by an international court, and forms the very basis of modern-day legal systems.

At DAIMUN you will get the opportunity to understand and be a part of 2 of the most significant cases in human history. 2 watershed moments, one that defined the 20th century, and one that will define the 21st. You will aim to deliver justice to the millions impacted by international conflicts, and prove the efficacy and importance of the world’s foremost legal systems.

Our first case explores the Allegations of Genocide under the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Ukraine v. Russian Federation). A case addressing the events that could have been the match that set the world alight, challenging the world order, and accelerating the development of a multi-polar world in a renewed battle to become the international hegemon. The fiery case began due to the Russian annexation of Crimea and Russia’s support for separatist movements in Southeast Ukraine, sparking a period of destruction in Ukraine. Ukraine’s rapidly ameliorating relations with the Western World, Russia’s longstanding opponents led to Russia initiating its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, escalating the case and bringing it to the forefront of international discourse. But two prevailing questions remain, were the Russian actions illegal, and more importantly, were they justified? Were Russia’s actions genocidal, or simply protective of their own interests?

Our second case explores The Trial of Karl Dönitz, admiral of the German Navy during world war 2, and for a brief period, leader of the Third Reich. A period of harsh violence, the likes of which the world had never seen before and would never see again, with a death toll in the millions. The Nuremberg Tribunal was established to bring justice for the deceased, and put the leaders of the infamous The Third Reich on trial. The case at DAIMUN focuses on Karl Dönitz and his part in the war, focusing on his role in the development of submarine warfare and his personal relationship with Adolf Hitler, leaving us with two main questions: is it fair to try crimes only established in the aftermath of its events? Should a loyal soldier be held accountable for following orders, or do they have a moral duty to disobey orders deemed so heinous?

With these ethical dilemmas and considerations to be had, the international courts explore the most significant legal battles, and look to redefine the past, present and future of the world. My distinguished deputy presidents and I encouragingly invite you to the International Courts at DAIMUN 2024, a platform on which we hope transforms your understanding of the legal world.

Warm Regards,
Aditya Ankhad
President of the International Courts,
Jiana Shroff and Prisha Israni
Deputy Presidents of the International Courts
DAIMUN 2024